Kling 2.6 Pro vs Wan
Kling 2.6 Pro and Wan are both available on Pixel Engine. This page compares what they actually cost and what they can do, generated from the live catalogue rather than written by hand.
Specifications side by side
| Kling 2.6 Pro | Wan | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | video | video |
| Credits (base) | 11 | 11 |
| Cost per generation | $0.73–$1.10 | $0.73–$1.10 |
| Cost per second of video | $0.15–$0.22 | $0.15–$0.22 |
| Durations (s) | 5,10 | 5 |
| Resolutions | — | — |
| Aspect ratios | 16:9,9:16,1:1 | 16:9,9:16,1:1 |
| Image to video | Yes | No |
| Start + end frame | No | No |
| Native audio | Yes | No |
| Requires an input image | No | Yes |
| Negative prompt | Yes | Yes |
| Seed control (repeatable results) | No | No |
| Multiple reference images | No | No |
| Served by | fal | fal |
Cost by clip length
| Length | Kling 2.6 Pro | Wan |
|---|---|---|
| 5s | 11 credits | 11 credits |
| 10s | 22 credits | — |
Which should you use?
Both models price identically per generation on current plan rates, so the choice comes down to the capability differences listed above.
The concrete differences are:
- Durations (s): Kling 2.6 Pro 5,10, Wan 5
- Image to video: Kling 2.6 Pro Yes, Wan No
- Native audio: Kling 2.6 Pro Yes, Wan No
- Requires an input image: Kling 2.6 Pro No, Wan Yes
Run the same prompt on both
Both models are on one account with shared credits, so you can generate the identical prompt on each and compare the real output instead of taking a table's word for it.
Start freeCommon questions
Can I use both Kling 2.6 Pro and Wan on one account?
Yes. Both are available on Pixel Engine from the same credit balance, so you can switch between them without a second subscription.
Which one generates audio?
Kling 2.6 Pro generates native audio with the video. The other produces silent video that you would need to score separately.
Can I animate an existing image?
Kling 2.6 Pro support image-to-video, so you can supply a still frame as the starting point rather than generating from text alone.