Pixel Engine Start free

Kling 3 Pro vs Wan

Updated 2026-08-21

Kling 3 Pro and Wan are both available on Pixel Engine. This page compares what they actually cost and what they can do, generated from the live catalogue rather than written by hand.

Specifications side by side

Kling 3 ProWan
Typevideovideo
Credits (base)1611
Cost per generation$1.07–$1.60$0.73–$1.10
Cost per second of video$0.21–$0.32$0.15–$0.22
Durations (s)5,105
Resolutions
Aspect ratios16:9,9:16,1:116:9,9:16,1:1
Image to videoYesNo
Start + end frameNoNo
Native audioYesNo
Requires an input imageNoYes
Negative promptYesYes
Seed control (repeatable results)NoNo
Multiple reference imagesNoNo
Served byfalfal

Cost by clip length

LengthKling 3 ProWan
5s16 credits11 credits
10s32 credits

Which should you use?

Wan is the cheaper of the two per generation on current plan rates. That does not make it the better choice for every shot — check the capability rows above, because Kling 3 Pro may support options Wan does not.

The concrete differences are:

Run the same prompt on both

Both models are on one account with shared credits, so you can generate the identical prompt on each and compare the real output instead of taking a table's word for it.

Start free

Common questions

Which is cheaper, Kling 3 Pro or Wan?

Wan costs less per generation at current plan rates. Exact cost depends on clip length and resolution — see the cost table above.

Can I use both Kling 3 Pro and Wan on one account?

Yes. Both are available on Pixel Engine from the same credit balance, so you can switch between them without a second subscription.

Which one generates audio?

Kling 3 Pro generates native audio with the video. The other produces silent video that you would need to score separately.

Can I animate an existing image?

Kling 3 Pro support image-to-video, so you can supply a still frame as the starting point rather than generating from text alone.

Related